Colorado is home to almost 24 million acres of forest. The Forest Inventory and Analysis (FIA) program helps document how they change across time.

The science for FIA is unusual, or at least unlike what most people envision. There are no lab coats, there are no test tubes. The work is intensely physical. Everyone who works this job has scars on their hands and arms from a bad fall or a thorny plant.

We work in tandem with nature, which comes with its own set of intensities. Wildlife sightings are almost daily; a thunderstorm can be life threatening.

You start appreciating weird, little things. Flat rocks for sitting are a godsend. The shade. The quiet. Short hikes, especially those that are on trail or don't force you to climb up a mountain.

I take the road less traveled a lot for this job. The views are hard to beat.

Let’s dive into the methods.

It would be logistically impossible to measure every tree in Colorado. Instead, the FIA program randomly chooses "plots" across the state. Each plot is structured like this figure. We'll stay with this figure for a while.

Trees are one of the main focuses on each subplot. Trees with diameters greater than or equal to 5 inches qualify and are included in the data. Some tree species are measured at breast height (4.5 feet from the base of the tree), while others are measured at their base. We use specialized tape to wrap the trees. It's important to wrap the tree as perpendicularly as possible so that the measurement isn't overestimated.

We mark the trees we measure with aluminum nails. This helps future researchers find the plots and keeps trees organized within the FIA database.

For each tree that is large enough on a subplot, the FIA program measures its length. It's tempting to say we measure a tree's height, but heights don't account for any leaning or bends along the trunk. Those are included in our measurements, so it's more accurate to call them "lengths."

For smaller trees, you can use a tape measure to reach the top of a tree, but the majority of trees are far too tall for that. In those cases, we use the good old Pythagorean theorem. Here, a coworker holds a "laser," which can measure the distance to a faraway object. Standing uphill from the tree in question, all you have to do is point the laser at the bole of the tree, then at its base, and then at its top. The laser will spit out a number for the height of the tree. It's surprisingly accurate.

The FIA program measures dead and live trees. For live trees, "crown cover," the total amount of the tree that is covered by live leaves or needles, is estimated visually. Crown cover is an indicator of tree health. For dead trees, we document the cause of death. Fire and insects are two of the most common mortality factors. If a tree has suffered damages, we document those, too.

Understory vegetation is another variable we monitor on each subplot. This data is helpful for modeling the level of wildfire risk in the area. Vegetation is split into four different categories: grasses, forbs, shrubs, and trees. If a tree does not qualify by diameter for the inventory, it is counted as understory vegetation. We record plant species that cover at least 3% of the total area on a subplot.

Sometimes, we take a small sample from the tree using an increment borer. We can track a tree's age and growth patterns by counting the rings measuring the space in between them. The more space, the faster the growth. Boring a tree isn't significantly damaging.

Some tree cores are harder to count than others. This Utah Juniper tree has particularly tight rings.

Because so much of our work is off the grid, camping is the easiest way to stay close to plots. I'd estimate that I spent about 60 nights sleeping in a tent in 2024 for work.

The time outside is nice for photography. I took this image right outside of my tent after work.

FIA is a national program. The data is open source. Scientists across the country use this research to study a myriad of topics, from shifting ecological ranges of edible plants to how drought affects tree growth and mortality. Especially because the FIA program spans whole country, this data has regional and national policy inroads.

FIA data also informed the Colorado's Forest Resources 2004 - 2013 report, which evaluated current issues our forests face, including damage from pine and spruce beetles and the connection between drought and the sudden decline of quaking aspen trees. Click on the above image to be taken to the full report.

Click on this image to be taken to the Colorado State Forest Service's website for more information.

Or just ask me (and by proxy, my boss Dan). My email is mitchkorolev@gmail.com, my phone number is 317-565-9600. Don't hesitate to reach out with any questions! Thanks for reading!

Previous
Previous

Tanguro Field Station: photographing land use change research at the edge of the Amazon Rainforest